Salta al contenuto principale
All articles
Owners

Disputes and nuisance between neighbours in a condominium: what to do

Disputes between neighbours in a condominium often stem from noise, smells and emissions beyond normal tolerability. Here is what the Civil Code says, the steps to follow, the administrator's role and the legal remedies available.

Leggi questo articolo in italiano

Disputes between neighbours in a condominium are among the most frequent and wearing problems of shared living. Noise at unsuitable hours, strong smells, leaks, improper use of common parts, disturbing behaviour: situations that start from small things and can escalate. Knowing how to act, with which tools and in which order, helps solve most cases without going to court, and to protect oneself when the conflict does not settle.

What the Civil Code says on emissions

The main reference is article 844 of the Civil Code, dedicated to emissions. The rule states that the owner must bear the emissions of smoke, heat, fumes, noise, vibrations and similar propagations coming from the neighbour's property only if they do not exceed normal tolerability, taking into account the conditions of the place. The criterion of normal tolerability is therefore the pivot: below that threshold one must bear it, above it one can act.

Disturbing noise and normal tolerability

In a condominium we speak of disturbing noise when the acoustic emissions coming from one or more units exceed the threshold of normal tolerability and cause disturbance. The assessment is not abstract: it depends on the context, the hour, the duration and the nature of the noise. Occasional noise is one thing, a continuous and repeated disturbance is another. Proof often requires a phonometric survey measuring the actual level against the background noise.

Disputes between neighbours: the most frequent causes

Beyond noise, the sources of friction between neighbours are many and recurring. Strong smells from kitchens or systems, cigarette smoke invading balconies, pets left alone and noisy, improper use of common parts such as entrance halls and courtyards, leaks passing from one unit to another, bulky objects on the landings. Some of these behaviours breach the condominium rules and can be addressed by the administrator, others remain private relationships between the two owners. Telling the two levels apart from the start points to the right tool and avoids wasting time and energy.

What to do: the steps to follow

It is best to proceed by degrees, from the lightest remedy to the most incisive. Many conflicts are resolved at the very first steps.

  1. Direct and civil conversation: often those causing the disturbance are unaware of it and a calm talk is enough to solve it.
  2. Report to the administrator in writing, when the behaviour breaches the condominium rules.
  3. Formal warning to the neighbour, usually by registered letter or certified email, describing the facts and asking it to stop.
  4. Mediation, as an attempt at conciliation before court.
  5. Court action, if the behaviour does not stop after the warning.

The administrator's role

The administrator has the duty to enforce the condominium rules. If the disturbance breaches one of their provisions, the administrator can intervene by cautioning the owner, warning them and, in the cases provided, applying the financial penalties set by the rules. However, the administrator cannot replace the judge: when the dispute concerns only two private properties and does not touch the common parts or the rules, it remains a matter between individuals, which the administrator can at most facilitate by fostering dialogue.

Mediation

Even when it is not mandatory, mediation is often the most useful step before a lawsuit. It is a conciliation tool that is quicker and cheaper than litigation, and in neighbour disputes it allows practical solutions to be found, such as soundproofing a system or changing a schedule, which a judgment could hardly modulate with the same flexibility. An agreement reached in mediation is binding between the parties.

Court action and remedies

If the neighbour does not change behaviour after the warning, one can act in court with an injunction claim. After ascertaining the intolerability, the judge can order the disturbance to cease, arrange the works needed to eliminate it definitively, such as soundproofing systems or spaces, and grant compensation for the damage suffered. In the most serious cases the disturbing conduct can also have criminal relevance, for example as disturbance of people's occupations or rest.

Preventing conflicts

Prevention comes from clear condominium rules that set out standards of coexistence and schedules, and from orderly communication between owners and administrator. Keeping track of reports, warnings and replies is decisive, because documentation makes the difference both in mediation and in court. An orderly log of complaints, with dates and content, also helps tell occasional disturbance apart from continuous and repeated disturbance, which is exactly the element against which the exceeding of normal tolerability is measured.

Managing reports with management software

Condominium management software helps handle disputes between neighbours in a condominium in a traceable way: collecting reports, sending written communications, keeping a history of actions and an archive of the rules and correspondence. Having everything documented protects the administrator and strengthens the condominium's position in any mediation or lawsuit. AmministraPro lets you manage communications with owners and keep documents per building and per unit. You can see how it works on the features page or compare the plans in the pricing section.

Manage your buildings with AmministraPro

Accounting, meetings, communications and AI in one Italian software, compliant with UNI 10801 and GDPR.