Salta al contenuto principale

Accounting

Mistakes to avoid in the condominium accounts

The condominium annual accounts are the document on which most of the trust between the property manager and the owners rests, and they are also the document most often challenged at the assembly or in court. Article 1130 bis of the Italian civil code sets precise drafting criteria: a bookkeeping register, a financial summary, and an explanatory note. Many disputes do not arise from wrongdoing but from avoidable mistakes: a cash balance that does not reconcile, an item shifted from one year to another without explanation, an outstanding balance not carried forward. This guide lists the most recurring mistakes in daily practice and the checks a property manager should run before bringing the accounts to the assembly, showing where management software such as AmministraPro reduces the risk of human error.

Income, expenses, and cash balance that do not reconcile

The first mistake, and the most visible one to owners, is an account that does not balance: income minus expenses does not match the declared closing cash balance. This happens when a payment is recorded twice, when an owner's payment is not correctly matched to the instalment it covers, or when bank movements such as interest, fees, or internal transfers are left out of the register.

The check a property manager should always run before calling the assembly that approves the accounts is reconciling the year end bank balance against the cash balance shown in the bookkeeping register: if the two figures do not match, the accounts are not ready. AmministraPro links every payment received and every expense to its underlying bank movement and calculates the cash balance automatically, flagging discrepancies before they reach the final document.

Mixing the accrual basis and the cash basis without declaring it

A frequent conceptual mistake is blending the two accounting bases without stating which one applies: recording an expense in the year it was paid rather than the year it was incurred, or the reverse, inconsistently across line items. An elevator maintenance invoice received in December but paid in January of the following year, for example, must be allocated according to a criterion chosen in advance and applied consistently, not according to what is convenient at the time.

The law does not impose one single criterion on every building, but it does require consistency and transparency: the criterion adopted must remain the same from one year to the next and must be stated explicitly in the explanatory note, so owners can compare years without confusion. Changing criterion without explaining it is one of the most common grounds for challenging the accounts in court.

Outstanding balances not carried forward correctly to the next year

Another recurring mistake concerns outstanding balances: instalments not yet collected from owners in arrears, supplier invoices not yet paid, unspent cash reserves. If these amounts are not carried forward precisely into the following year's accounts, the new budget starts from an incorrect opening balance, and the mistake compounds year after year, becoming harder to spot each time.

AmministraPro carries forward outstanding receivables and payables automatically from one year to the next, with every owner's payment history always available.

  • Reconcile the list of owners in arrears against the outstanding receivables carried forward, owner by owner.
  • Verify that every invoice received but not yet paid appears among the outstanding payables.
  • Do not close the year until the opening balance of the new year has been checked against the previous year's closing balance.

Missing or too generic explanatory note

Article 1130 bis requires the accounts to be accompanied by an explanatory note describing ongoing relationships and pending matters. A common mistake is presenting accounts made only of number tables, with no text explaining unusual entries, ongoing extraordinary works, or disputes open with suppliers or owners in arrears.

An effective explanatory note does not need to be long, but it must answer the questions an owner would naturally ask when reading the figures: why has this item increased, what is the status of works approved the previous year, which arrears are being recovered. Accounts without this narrative part are formally incomplete and give owners a legitimate reason to challenge them at the assembly.

Wrong or outdated apportionment tables

A last frequent mistake: applying outdated apportionment tables that were never updated after a structural change to the building, or using the wrong criterion for a specific expense, for instance apportioning by general ownership shares an expense that article 1123 of the civil code requires to be split by use, such as the elevator or centralized heating. The mistake affects every single owner and can generate complex adjustments to correct the following year.

AmministraPro manages multiple apportionment tables for the same unit, property, stairs, elevator, heating, and applies the correct one automatically to each expense line, reducing the risk of wrong apportionments and making it easier to demonstrate at the assembly how each amount was calculated.

Frequently asked questions

What happens if the condominium accounts do not balance?

If income and expenses do not match the declared cash balance, the assembly can refuse to approve the accounts, or if they are approved anyway, an owner can challenge them in court within the statutory deadlines. The property manager should always reconcile the bank balance against the bookkeeping register before presenting the document, something software like AmministraPro does automatically for every recorded movement.

Is the explanatory note a legal requirement?

Yes, article 1130 bis of the Italian civil code requires it explicitly alongside the bookkeeping register and the financial summary. It must describe ongoing relationships and pending matters, not just figures: accounts made only of tables, without this narrative part, are formally incomplete and more easily challenged.

Can the accrual versus cash criterion be changed from one year to the next?

It is not advisable to do so without explicitly explaining the change in the explanatory note, because it makes the accounts of different years incomparable and can be read as a way to hide expense items. Consistency between years is one of the criteria courts weigh when an owner challenges the accounts.

How do you avoid mistakes with outstanding balances carried forward from year to year?

By reconciling, before closing the year, the list of owners in arrears against the outstanding receivables carried forward, and verifying that every invoice received but not paid appears among the outstanding payables. The new year's opening balance must always match the previous year's closing balance: AmministraPro performs this carry forward automatically, reducing the margin for manual error.

Why is a wrong apportionment table such a costly mistake to fix?

Because it affects every single owner at the same time: an incorrect adjustment generates further accounting entries the following year to correct the mistake, with the risk of additional disputes. Using multiple, up to date apportionment tables, as AmministraPro allows, and applying the correct criterion under article 1123 of the civil code for each expense line significantly reduces this risk.

Try AmministraPro

Accounting, thousandths-based cost splitting, meetings, communications and artificial intelligence in a single Italian software, compliant with UNI 10801 and GDPR.