Comparison
Certified email or plain email for official condominium notices
Plain email and certified email (PEC, posta elettronica certificata) look like the same tool, but they carry very different legal weight when it comes to official condominium communications. Ordinary email is fast and free but produces no enforceable proof of delivery, while PEC generates acceptance and delivery receipts with legal value under Presidential Decree 68/2005. Article 66 of the implementing provisions of the Italian Civil Code requires, for calling the owners' meeting, a means that ensures proof of receipt: here plain email is not enough, whereas PEC is expressly allowed. This guide distinguishes case by case when the ordinary channel is sufficient and when certification becomes indispensable.
Compared
| Criterion | Plain email | Certified email (PEC) |
|---|---|---|
| Proof of receipt | No enforceable proof, reading is not certified | Delivery receipt with legal value under Decree 68/2005 |
| Calling the meeting | Not suitable on its own under Article 66 of the implementing provisions | Expressly allowed by Article 66 of the implementing provisions |
| Cost | Free or included in the management software | Annual mailbox fee, very low per-message cost |
| Typical use | Informational notices, reminders, non-contestable attachments | Meeting notices, arrears reminders, formal demands, formal acts |
| Recipient requirement | A simple email address | A PEC address formally provided by the owner |
The underlying legal difference
Ordinary email transmits the message but certifies nothing: the sender receives no proof that the recipient actually received the content in their mailbox, and in the event of a dispute there is no document with a certain date and time to produce. PEC, by contrast, routes the message through accredited providers that issue an acceptance receipt to the sender and a delivery receipt when the message enters the recipient's mailbox, with value enforceable against third parties.
This distinction is not formal but substantive: many condominium communications produce legal effects that run from the date of receipt, from the deadlines to challenge a resolution to the formal notice of default of an owner. Entrusting such acts to a channel that leaves no certain trace exposes the manager to the risk of being unable to demonstrate compliance with statutory deadlines.
When plain email is sufficient
Not everything the manager communicates needs evidential strength. A reminder about a contractor's intervention date, information about a temporary lift outage, sharing a document already discussed at the meeting, or a courtesy notice about cleaning of the common areas are informational communications that create no forfeiture and no obligation with a deadline. For these, ordinary email is perfectly adequate, faster and without additional cost.
The practical criterion is simple: if the communication does not trigger a legal deadline, an effect on the owner's rights or possible proof in court, plain email does its job well. Certification should be reserved for acts where the date of receipt truly matters.
- Reminders and informational notices with no legal deadline
- Sharing documents already known or not contestable
- Courtesy communications about daily condominium life
- Invitations to informal, non-deliberating gatherings
When PEC is required
Certified mail becomes necessary whenever the communication must produce enforceable proof of receipt. The main case is calling the owners' meeting, which Article 66 of the implementing provisions requires to be communicated at least five days in advance by a means suitable to prove receipt, expressly listing PEC alongside registered mail, ordinary mail with a delivery receipt, and fax. A notice sent only by plain email is vulnerable to annulment of the resolution for a defect in the calling procedure.
Likewise, arrears reminders and formal demands should be sent through a traceable channel, both to document recovery attempts and because proof of receipt of the payment demand is often relevant to obtaining an injunction. In all these cases PEC offers certainty about the date and delivery that ordinary email cannot guarantee.
Managing the two channels without confusion
In practice the office uses both channels for the same condominium: PEC for formal acts, email for the daily flow. The risk is fragmentation, with PEC and ordinary addresses scattered across different address books and delivery receipts filed by hand. Management software that keeps both the email and PEC address on each owner's record, and sends each document through the correct channel while storing the receipts in the history, significantly reduces the margin for error.
AmministraPro follows this approach: informational communications go out by email from the condominium records, while meeting notices and reminders can be sent by PEC and remain linked to the originating case, with receipts stored automatically. The available features are described on the features page at /funzioni, while the plans with the various channels included can be compared on the pricing page at /prezzi.
Frequently asked questions
Can I call the meeting with a plain email if everyone confirmed they read it?
It is not advisable. Article 66 of the implementing provisions of the Italian Civil Code requires a means that ensures proof of receipt, and ordinary email generates no enforceable receipt. A voluntary read confirmation does not have the same legal value and can be contested. For calling the meeting it is always better to use PEC, registered mail or the other suitable means set out in the rule.
Does plain email have any evidential value?
Very limited. Ordinary email may serve as an indication of sending, but it does not prove delivery or a certain date of receipt, and its effectiveness depends on the judge's assessment in the specific case. For acts on which deadlines or effects on the owner's rights depend it does not offer the necessary certainty, which PEC instead guarantees through its receipts.
If an owner has no PEC, how do I send official communications?
Article 66 of the implementing provisions provides, as an alternative, registered mail, ordinary mail with a delivery receipt, or fax. PEC is used only when the owner has formally provided a certified address. In practice the condominium often lives with a mix of channels, and it helps for the software to record for each owner the suitable means to use.
Is it worth activating PEC even for a small condominium?
It depends on the volume of formal acts. Even a small condominium calls at least one meeting a year and may need to send reminders: in these cases PEC reduces postal costs and speeds up communications, with receipts already in electronic form. A mailbox's annual fee is generally modest compared with the saving on registered letters and the time gained in management.
How do I avoid choosing the wrong channel using management software?
Software like AmministraPro associates both the email and PEC address with each owner and sends each document through the correct channel, storing the receipts in the communication history. This way meeting notices and reminders go out by PEC and informational notices by email, without having to reconstruct by hand which means to use for each recipient and without risking entrusting a formal act to an unsuitable channel.
Try AmministraPro
Accounting, thousandths-based cost splitting, meetings, communications and artificial intelligence in a single Italian software, compliant with UNI 10801 and GDPR.