An accessibility plan for the condominium under Law 13 of 1989

Why think in terms of a plan and not a single work

Acting only when an owner reports an urgency leads to hasty decisions and solutions that do not talk to each other: a ramp at the entrance is of little use if the stairs then remain insurmountable. A plan looks at the person's whole journey, from the street to their apartment, and identifies all the barriers to overcome, so that each work is a piece of an overall design.

Thinking in terms of a plan also allows costs to be optimised: some works can be scheduled together, using the same site or the same building files, and priorities can be spread over time according to the condominium's resources. The result is a progressively more accessible building, without disorderly and repeated spending.

• Accessibility is a continuous path, not a single point
• The plan avoids uncoordinated works and repeated costs
• Priorities are spread over time according to resources

The survey of the building's barriers

The first step is a mapping, ideally entrusted to a technician, of all the barriers present: steps at the entrance, raised thresholds, level changes in the courtyard, internal stairs, width of common doors, absence of an elevator or handrails. The survey photographs the state of the building against the technical accessibility rules and identifies the critical points.

To each barrier the technician associates possible solutions: a ramp, a stair lift, an elevator, widening a door, installing handrails on both sides. For each one the order of magnitude of costs and the complexity of the process is estimated. This overall picture is the basis for discussing at the meeting in an informed, not emotional, way.

Priorities, timing and economic sustainability

Not all barriers have the same urgency. Priorities are defined based on the concrete needs of the people living in the building, the impact of each work on overall accessibility and economic sustainability. A realistic plan spreads the works over a span of time, indicating which to address immediately and which to schedule.

At this stage it is useful to consider the tax incentives possibly available for accessibility works, verifying the rules in force with a professional, and the possibility of setting up a dedicated fund. An economically sustainable plan is far more likely to be approved and completed than a list of works without financial coverage.

• Define priorities on real needs and impact
• Spread the works over a realistic span of time
• Consider tax incentives and a dedicated fund

Bringing the plan to the meeting

An accessibility plan is not approved in a single vote: each work remains a resolution of its own, with the agenda, the design and the cost-sharing criterion. However, presenting the overall picture to the meeting, with the survey and the priorities, helps owners understand the logic of the works and vote on them with greater awareness.

Accessibility works enjoy the reduced majority of Article 1120 of the Italian Civil Code, and this eases approval. Where the meeting does not act, the individual retains the power to proceed at their own expense within the limits of Law 13 of 1989. A shared plan reduces conflicts and turns accessibility into a common goal rather than a series of isolated clashes.

Managing the plan over time

A multi-year plan requires keeping track of completed works, remaining priorities, resolutions, costs and maintenance of the installations put in place. Without an orderly tool the plan risks getting lost from one financial year to the next, especially if the manager changes.

With management software like AmministraPro the manager can archive the survey and the designs, track the resolutions and costs of each work and schedule the maintenance of the accessibility installations, keeping the plan alive over time. The available features can be reviewed on the /funzioni and /prezzi pages.

Frequently asked questions