The meeting and authorization to litigate (Article 1131)
The manager represents the condominium, but for disputes exceeding their powers the meeting's authorization or ratification is needed. We look at what Article 1131 says and how to resolve correctly.
In this guide
The manager represents the condominium and may litigate within the scope of their own powers, but for disputes that exceed them the meeting's authorization or ratification is needed. This is established by Article 1131 of the Italian Civil Code, which ties procedural representation to the management powers under Article 1130. Distinguishing matters that fall within the manager's powers from those that exceed them is essential: in the first case the manager acts and defends alone, in the second the meeting's resolution is the prerequisite for validly bringing or defending proceedings.
Representation under Article 1131
Article 1131 grants the manager active and passive representation of the condominium. Active representation, i.e. the power to litigate, is anchored to the powers under Article 1130 and to those conferred by the regulation or the meeting. Passive representation, i.e. standing to receive judicial claims against the condominium, is broader: the manager may be sued for any action concerning the common parts. This asymmetry explains why, when bringing a case, you must check whether the matter falls within the manager's own powers.
Matters within the powers
For some actions the manager needs no authorization, because they fall within their typical powers. This is the case for the collection of condominium contributions, for which the manager may seek and obtain an injunction order against the defaulting owner, or for defending proceedings on matters concerning the execution of resolutions and the preservation of common parts. In these areas procedural initiative is consistent with the management role and does not require the meeting's prior go-ahead.
- Collection of contributions and injunction order against defaulters
- Execution of meeting resolutions
- Conservative actions on the common parts
- Defence in proceedings on management matters
Matters exceeding the powers
When the dispute concerns matters going beyond ordinary management powers, the manager must be authorized by the meeting to bring or defend the action. Typically this category includes controversies that affect common rights in a way not reducible to simple management, or challenges that require a substantive choice by the community. In these cases the meeting's resolution, adopted with the required majorities, is the necessary prerequisite for valid participation in the proceedings.
Prior authorization and subsequent ratification
The meeting's will may be expressed before or after the start of the dispute. Prior authorization is the most straightforward route: the meeting resolves to act or defend and confers a mandate on the manager, who in turn may appoint counsel. Subsequent ratification cures an initiative taken by the manager on an urgent or precautionary basis: the meeting, taking note, approves the conduct and adopts the procedural choice as its own. In both cases the minutes must clearly indicate the subject of the dispute, the decision and any conferral of the mandate.
The practical caution is not to wait until the last moment: bringing the matter to the agenda in good time lets the meeting resolve knowingly and prevents the manager from participating in proceedings without adequate meeting backing.
Cost of the dispute and allocation
Decisions on litigation have an economic side the meeting must consider. Legal costs to bring or defend a dispute fall on the condominium according to the relevant allocation criteria, save a different allocation if the counterparty loses. Resolving knowingly also means assessing the economic risk of the action, the appropriateness of mediation, which for many condominium disputes is a condition of admissibility, and the impact of costs on owners. Transparency on these aspects reduces internal conflict.
- Identify whether the matter exceeds the manager's powers
- Resolve on authorization or ratification with the correct majorities
- Assess mandatory mediation where required
- Consider the economic risk and the allocation of legal costs
Managing litigation resolutions and documents
Authorizations to litigate, ratifications and legal costs must be tracked in an orderly way, from the resolution to the allocation of costs. With AmministraPro the manager minutes decisions on litigation, keeps the related documentation and allocates legal costs among owners according to the criteria set. The features for meetings, archiving and accounting are described at /funzioni, while the plans for firms of every size are at /prezzi.
Manage your buildings with AmministraPro
Accounting, meetings, communications and AI in one Italian software, compliant with UNI 10801 and GDPR.
Written by the AmministraPro Editorial Team
The AmministraPro editorial team closely follows condominium law, accounting and digital tools for administrators and property firms.
Related reading
Revising the Thousandths Tables: Meeting and Consent
Thousandths tables are not immutable. Article 69 of the implementing provisions distinguishes the cases where a meeting majority suffices from those requiring the consent of all owners.
ReadCalculating the Quorum: Heads and Thousandths
The condominium quorum is calculated neither on thousandths alone nor on heads alone, but by combining the two parameters. Here is a step-by-step way to verify valid constitution and resolutions.
ReadChallenging the resolution approving the financial report
An owner who believes the report-approval resolution is flawed can challenge it before the judge. Here are the thirty-day term of Article 1137, who has standing to act, the difference between nullity and voidability, and the most common defects.
Read