Annulled resolution: can you get back the instalments paid?
Annulment of a resolution works retroactively, but until the decision falls the owner must pay. Here is when and how paid sums are recovered, and what changes in the case of nullity.
In this guide
If a resolution approving an expense is annulled by the court, the sums paid under that resolution can in principle be recovered, because annulment operates retroactively and removes the basis for the payment. Note, however, that until the resolution is annulled it remains effective, and the owner must pay the instalments. A challenge, as a rule, does not suspend enforcement of the decision. Only after the resolution falls does the path to a refund open.
The resolution's effect during a challenge
Article 1137 of the Italian Civil Code states that challenging a resolution does not suspend its enforcement. This means that, even having challenged it, the owner must continue to pay the contributions resolved. The condominium can indeed act to recover unpaid sums. An owner who believes they are right cannot therefore reduce their own share or stop paying while awaiting the judgment: they would risk an injunction order.
If enforcing the resolution risks producing serious and hardly reversible consequences, the owner may ask the court for interim suspension. Suspension is not automatic and must be reasoned; when granted, it temporarily halts the effects of the resolution pending the decision on the merits.
The retroactivity of annulment
When the resolution is annulled, the annulment has retroactive effect: it is as if the decision had never produced effects. As a result the payments made under it turn out to lack a cause. The sums paid become recoverable, meaning the owner can ask the condominium for their return under the rules on undue payment set by Article 2033 of the Italian Civil Code.
- Annulment cancels the resolution's effects from the outset
- Payments made lose their justifying basis
- The sums can be claimed back as an undue payment
- The right to a refund must still be exercised within the limitation period
Nullity and undue payment: an even clearer position
If the resolution is void rather than merely voidable, the situation is even clearer: nullity can be raised without the thirty-day deadline and by anyone with an interest. Here too, payments made under a void resolution lack a cause and are recoverable. The practical difference is that nullity does not require a timely challenge within the short mandatory deadline set for voidability.
How the refund is obtained in practice
Once the resolution has fallen, the owner can ask the manager to return the sums no longer due or to credit them to the accounts. If the condominium does not comply, the refund can be claimed in court. It is important to keep the payment receipts and the record of instalments paid under the fallen resolution, because they prove the amount to recover. It should also be considered that, if part of the expense is due on another basis anyway, the refund only concerns the share that is truly undue.
The importance of traceable accounting
Managing the effects of an annulment requires orderly accounting, able to reconstruct precisely which payments relate to the contested resolution and which amounts must be refunded or re-credited. Transparent reporting avoids errors in balancing and makes it easier to settle the accounts between the condominium and the individual owner after the judgment.
With AmministraPro the manager can link each instalment to the relevant resolution and expense, track owners' payments, and manage balancing transparently, so that any refunds are handled correctly. The accounting and instalment features are described on the /funzioni page and the plans on the /prezzi page.
Manage your buildings with AmministraPro
Accounting, meetings, communications and AI in one Italian software, compliant with UNI 10801 and GDPR.
Written by the AmministraPro Editorial Team
The AmministraPro editorial team closely follows condominium law, accounting and digital tools for administrators and property firms.
Related reading
Revising the Thousandths Tables: Meeting and Consent
Thousandths tables are not immutable. Article 69 of the implementing provisions distinguishes the cases where a meeting majority suffices from those requiring the consent of all owners.
ReadCalculating the Quorum: Heads and Thousandths
The condominium quorum is calculated neither on thousandths alone nor on heads alone, but by combining the two parameters. Here is a step-by-step way to verify valid constitution and resolutions.
ReadChallenging the resolution approving the financial report
An owner who believes the report-approval resolution is flawed can challenge it before the judge. Here are the thirty-day term of Article 1137, who has standing to act, the difference between nullity and voidability, and the most common defects.
Read